|
|
AT LAST, A CATHOLIC DOCUMENT
“And
suddenly I heard a voice from some nearby house, a boy’s voice
or a girl’s voice, I know not: but it was a sort of sing-song,
repeated again and again, ‘Take and read, take and read’…”
St Augustine of Hippo
Download
this document as a
PDF
It
has taken sixty years, but at last a truly Catholic document,
a document any pope from Gregory XVI to Pius XII would have
been proud to sponsor, has appeared in the public domain. It has not emanated from
the Vatican. Given the
betrayals of Catholic principle in which the successors of
these popes have, with increasing vehemence, engaged since
1962 that fact should surprise no one.
The last place any orthodox Catholic would look if he
wanted a statement of Catholic principle, a statement
unsullied by the Modernist ukase, is Rome, especially from the
present incumbent!
In September, 1846, Our Blessed Lady, appearing
to two shepherd children at La Salette, prophesied that Rome
would lose the faith. Circumspicite! Look about you, my fellow
Catholics! The
evidence is as clear as day!
The Church, the Catholic Church, has some 5,600
bishops. Of that
number, one only has demonstrated, belatedly – agreed, that he
is a Catholic, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, and has been
‘excommunicated’ for his stand.
All the others, no matter how Catholic they may think
themselves to be, are Modernists - progressive Modernists, or
conservative Modernists, but Modernists nonetheless. The proof of this is
that, to a man, they look for a compromise with the
Modernist virus. No Catholic
bishop would subject his faith to such an imposition.
Let us, then, heeding the advice given St
Augustine, take and read!
Michael Baker
July 2nd, 2026—the Visitation
_____________________________________
Appendix
PROFESSION
OF
CATHOLIC FAITH OF THE SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X TO ENLIGHTEN
SOULS IN THE FACE OF MODERN ERRORS
- I profess and embrace the entire truth of the
Catholic Faith, as it was “received by the Apostles from the
mouth of Christ Himself, or from the Apostles themselves,
the Holy Ghost dictating”, then faithfully preserved and
transmitted to us in unbroken succession within the Catholic
Church, through the preaching of Popes and bishops, the
writings of the Fathers of the Church and of theologians,
and the definitions of holy councils.
- I firmly receive each and every truth which the
infallible Church has proposed as divinely revealed and
necessary for salvation, whether through the definitions of
her solemn Magisterium or through the unanimity of her
Ordinary and Universal Magisterium. I likewise receive all
that belongs to Catholic doctrine by reason of its necessary
connexion with the revealed Deposit, and I hold as
certain the truths which the Church has taught with
constancy in order to safeguard that Deposit against errors.
- I consequently reject all errors contrary to
this Faith, and in particular those of liberalism,
indifferentism, modernism, ecumenism, and laicism, condemned
by Popes Pius IX, Leo XIII, Saint Pius X, Pius XI, and Pius
XII. These errors obscure revealed doctrine, falsify
Tradition, disfigure the sacred liturgy, corrupt morals,
weaken the missionary spirit, and disintegrate the Christian
social order, gravely harming the salvation of souls.
- I profess this Faith and reject all errors
contrary to it, because I wish to remain faithfully subject
to the Holy Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman Church, Mistress
of truth, and to the Pope, Vicar of Christ, in attachment to
eternal Rome, which has received the mission of guarding
holily and expounding faithfully the revealed Deposit until
the end of time.
- I add that, in the present confusion, it is no
longer sufficient to recall a few isolated truths. It has
become indispensable to set in full light the entire order
of Catholic doctrine, in its supernatural coherence and
luminous harmony, omitting no dogma, diminishing no truth,
and substituting for the received Faith no equivocal or
truncated language which, under the pretext of ecumenism or
adaptation to the world, disfigures this doctrine with ever
greater audacity.
- Charity itself demands that this doctrine be
professed with clarity, patience, and strength, for the
glory of God, the honour of the Church, and the salvation of
souls.
I.
Divine Revelation, the Faith, and Tradition
- I believe that God, in His goodness, has called
man, through the gift of grace, to obtain the Beatific
Vision. I hold firmly and profess that this exaltation of
man surpasses the powers and exigencies of human nature, and
that it is a gratuitous gift of God, that is to say, a
supernatural gift.
- I believe that God has not left man to his
natural powers alone, but has revealed to him the mysteries
of His divine life and the supernatural destiny to which He
calls him. Thus, having spoken of old through the Prophets
in the Old Covenant, He has spoken definitively through His
only-begotten Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ, in the New
Covenant, with which Divine Revelation received its perfect
fulfilment.
- This Revelation is the true Word of God,
entrusted to the Church as a Deposit, and proposed to men as
the Rule of Faith in the form of a body of doctrine, in
which the mysteries are formulated in a manner that renders
them intelligible and expressible in words. Revelation is
not the progressive expression of a religious consciousness,
nor the fruit of a collective experience of the believing
community; it is the very truth of God supernaturally
communicated to the minds of men for their salvation.
- I believe that the Deposit of the Faith was
completed with the death of the last Apostle. After the
Apostles, the Church receives no new Revelation: she guards,
explains, defends, and transmits the Deposit received.
- I recognize the external proofs of Revelation,
in particular miracles and prophecies, as most certain signs
by which the divine origin of the Christian religion is
demonstrated in a manner suited to the human intellect, in
every time and place. I likewise recognize the Church
herself, through her unity, holiness, catholicity,
fruitfulness, and invincible stability, as a permanent
motive of credibility and an irrefutable witness to her
divine mission.
- I profess that faith is the supernatural
submission of the intellect, under the motion of grace, to
the truth revealed externally by God. It rests neither upon
the evidence of things seen, nor upon private judgement, nor
upon experience of what is lived, but upon the very
authority of God Who speaks and Who, being the first Truth,
can neither deceive nor be deceived. Faith is therefore
neither a blind religious sentiment, nor an emotion of the
soul, nor an intimate conviction produced by personal or
collective consciousness. It is the supernatural virtue
which elevates the human intellect and enables it to know
God as He is, thanks to the testimony that God gives of
Himself, while awaiting the Vision.
- I consequently reject the error of modernism,
as it still rages today, which reduces faith to an interior
experience, to a sensible aspiration, or to a progressive
realization in the believing community. Such a conception
destroys the very notion of dogma and renders the obligation
to believe impossible, replacing divine truth with
subjective sincerity and handing doctrine over to the
fluctuations of history.
- I further profess that the Deposit of doctrine
revealed by God is contained in its two sources, namely
Sacred Scripture and Tradition. I profess that Tradition
contains many truths revealed by God which are not found in
Scripture, and that consequently Scripture must be read and
understood in dependence upon Tradition.
- I profess that Sacred Scripture, whose books
were written integrally, in all their parts, under the
inspiration of the Holy Ghost, is truly the Word of God,
free from all error, and entrusted to the authentic
interpretation of the Magisterium of the Church, according
to the norm of Tradition and according to the Analogy of
Faith.
- I therefore reject rationalist exegesis, which
treats the sacred books as documents having only man for
their author, which excludes a priori the possibility
of the supernatural, artificially separates the historical
Christ from the Faith of the Church, dissolves miracles into
symbols, or subjects Scripture to the shifting hypotheses
and manipulations of naturalistic critical methods. True
biblical scholarship must be placed at the service of the
understanding of the Faith; it is not to be made the rule,
the interpreter, or the judge of the Word of God.
- I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead
memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received
from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to
Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity
of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the
profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire
cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the
Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the
sense that it changes its meaning, but in the sense that the
living Magisterium proposes throughout the centuries, in an
ever clearer and more explicit manner, the same truth
according to the same meaning. What has been believed by
all, everywhere, and always, as belonging to the Faith,
cannot be denied or called into doubt by any theological
fashion, pastoral pressure, diplomatic necessity, or alleged
exigencies of the modern world.
II.
God, Principle and End of All Things, Holy Trinity
- I profess the existence of one God, personal,
living, and true, first principle and last end of all
things, Who in the beginning created Heaven and earth, all
things visible and invisible, from nothing. Infinitely
perfect, eternal, and almighty, immutable, incomprehensible
in His essence and sovereignly free in His works, He is
distinct from the world which He freely created, which He
conserves in existence, and which He governs by His
Providence.
- I profess that God can be known with certainty
by the natural light of reason from His creatures, as a
cause is known from its effects. The Catholic Faith
recognizes that the human intellect is capable of truly
attaining the reality of things, often of knowing their
causes, and of arriving at genuine certitudes.
- I therefore reject modern agnosticism,
philosophical scepticism, idealist subjectivism, and all
doctrines which limit the scope of human knowledge to
sensible phenomena or to the constructions of consciousness,
thereby denying the very possibility of an ecclesiastical
Magisterium and of a true theology.
- I confess that in the one Divine Nature there
subsist three really distinct Persons: the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Ghost, consubstantial and indivisible Trinity.
The Father is without principle; the Son is eternally
begotten of the Father; the Holy Ghost proceeds eternally
from the Father and the Son as from a single principle. But
these three Persons are one and the same Divine Substance:
They are one Eternal, not three Eternals; one wise, good,
and almighty God, not three equally wise, good, and almighty
gods; they are one in the Divine Will and Providence, and
enjoy one and the same glory.
- I reject the diminished professions of
trinitarian faith which, under pretext of religious unity or
ecumenical prudence, deliberately pass over in silence what
God has revealed about Himself. It does not suffice to say
with the Jews and Muslims that God is one; it does not
suffice to acknowledge with the Arians that the Son is of
the same nature as the Father; nor does it suffice to
confess with the schismatic Greeks that the Holy Ghost
proceeds from the Father while passing over in silence the Filioque.
This false irenicism pursues an illusory concord: by
omitting to profess certain revealed truths, it substitutes
confusion for clarity and threatens the integrity of the
Faith.
III.
The Creation of Man and the Supernatural Order of Grace
- I believe that God created man in His image,
endowed with a spiritual and immortal soul, capable of
knowing truth, of loving the good known by natural reason,
and of freely turning towards his Creator. Man is therefore
not the necessary product of a blind evolution, nor the
simple result of material forces; he comes from God as from
his creative cause, depends upon God, Who maintains him in
being, and is ordered to God as to his end.
- I profess that God did not destine man to his
natural perfection alone, but has freely called him to a
supernatural end which absolutely surpasses the powers and
rights of created nature: the Beatific Vision, by which the
soul shall see God face to face and participate in the
intimate life of the Most Holy Trinity. That man is called
to become a child of God, a partaker of the Divine Nature
and an heir of Heaven, is not the necessary fulfilment of
his nature, but a pure effect of divine liberality.
- I therefore reject every doctrine which
dissolves the distinction between nature and grace, which
makes supernatural life a requirement of human nature, or
which presents grace as a simple interior development of
man’s natural capacities. Such a confusion destroys both the
gratuity of the supernatural and the reality of nature. It
ends by reducing faith to a religious anthropology, and
Redemption to a revelation of man to himself.
- I likewise profess that grace neither destroys
nor replaces nature: it heals, elevates, and perfects it
whilst preserving it. The supernatural order calls into
question neither reason, nor the natural law, nor creatures;
it heals them and subordinates them to a higher end. This is
why the modern opposition between human freedom and grace,
between the dignity of the person and dependence upon God,
between culture and the Faith, is radically false.
- I reject the false religious humanism which
celebrates man in himself, as though the Incarnation had
revealed first and solely the image of God in the creation
of man, rather than the misery of sin and the mercy of God
stooping towards the sinner. Man is truly great only when he
humbly receives the grace which heals and elevates him, does
penance for his sins, submits to the truth, and lives as a
child of God. In separating himself from God, he does not
exalt himself: he destroys himself.
- I profess that human dignity, by which God has
established His creature at the summit of the material
world, can never be invoked against the law of God, against
the necessity of conversion, or against submission to
revealed truth. This dignity is wounded by sin: it must be
restored and raised to the dignity of the adoptive children
of God, through grace.
IV.
Original Sin and the Condition of Man
- I believe that our first parents were
established by God in a state of original justice and
holiness, and endowed with the gifts of integrity,
impassibility, and immortality. By a particular favour of
God, they possessed not only the integrity of their own
nature, but also the supernatural gifts which ordered them
to the very life of God. Adam, head and principle of the
human race, was additionally given the gift of knowledge.
- I profess that, by his disobedience, Adam truly
committed the original sin, which is transmitted to all men
by generation. This sin is for all a sin of nature, which
condemns them to death, suffering, ignorance, and
concupiscence. Having been stripped of sanctifying grace and
of preternatural gifts, which they could no longer transmit
to their descendants, Adam and Eve were driven from the
earthly paradise.
- In Adam, however, the nature of man was not
destroyed, but only wounded: his intellect, though darkened,
remains capable of knowing truth; his free will, though
weakened, remains capable of willing and loving natural
good. I therefore reject all doctrines which, in a
despairing pessimism, judge man to be irremediably corrupt
and incapable of any good.
- I likewise reject all doctrines which, in a
senseless optimism, minimize original sin, naively exalt the
native goodness of man, or claim to found universal peace
upon the moral, technical, political, or cultural progress
of humanity alone. The tragedies of history, the disorders
of societies, and the darkness of the human heart are
explained fundamentally, first and foremost, by the deep
wound of sin.
- I profess that man needs to be saved by a
redemption which delivers him both from original sin and
from all his personal sins. This redemption — or ‘buying
back’ — requires the gift of God’s grace in Christ: without
it, man cannot save himself by his natural works, his
culture, his science, or his religious sincerity. Without
the sanctifying grace of Christ, he remains incapable of
attaining his supernatural end.
- I therefore reject modern naturalism, whether
theoretical (in philosophy or theology) or practical (in
morality, politics, or pastoral work). Every doctrine which
speaks of fraternity, peace, dignity, or progress, without
acknowledging sin, the Cross, or the necessity of grace,
builds upon an illusory foundation and ends by deceiving the
souls it claims to serve.
- I profess at the same time that the gravity of
sin should never lead to despair, for God, in His mercy, did
not abandon man after his fall, but from the very beginning
promised him a Saviour born of the Woman, Whose coming He
progressively prepared throughout the history of salvation.
- In all this, I profess that the facts recorded
by the Book of Genesis concerning the foundations of the
Catholic religion are to be taken in their literal,
historical sense: for example, the creation of all things by
God at the beginning of time; the special creation of man;
the formation of the first woman from the first man; the
unity of the human race; the original happiness of our first
parents in the state of justice, integrity, and immortality;
the commandment given by God to man to test his obedience;
the transgression of the divine precept at the instigation
of the devil in the form of the serpent; the fall of our
first parents from that primal state of innocence; and the
promise of the Redeemer to come.
V.
Jesus Christ, Word Incarnate, Sole Mediator and Redeemer
- I believe and profess that Our Lord Jesus
Christ is the Eternal Word of God, true God and true man,
consubstantial with the Father in His Divinity and of the
same nature as ourselves in His humanity, like us in all
things save sin. He is the sole Mediator between God and
men, the sole Saviour of the human race, the sole King of
souls and of societies, promised by God in His mercy to our
first parents and announced by the prophets.
- I profess that, in the fullness of time, the
Son of God became incarnate, not to confirm man in his human
dignity or to reveal to him the image of God within himself,
but to save him from sin and once again give him access to
eternal life. Born of the Virgin Mary, without ceasing to be
God, He took a true human nature, lived among us, taught the
truth, fulfilled the prophecies, manifested His Divinity by
His miracles, and then freely offered himself on the Cross
as a propitiatory Sacrifice for the sins of the world.
- I profess that the Redemption is a true
satisfaction offered to Divine Justice, in reparation for
original sin and personal sins. Christ, Priest and Victim in
His holy humanity, redeemed us by His Blood. By bearing our
sins and undergoing the punishment due to us, He offered to
His Father a perfect act of obedience, an act of love and
reparation, to which the dignity of His Divine Person
conferred an infinite meritorious value.
- I therefore reject every doctrine which would
reduce the Redemption to a simple manifestation of God’s
love, to a solidarity of Christ with human sufferings, to a
revelation of the dignity of man, or to a purely moral,
political, or social liberation. The Cross is not merely a
sign: it is the altar of the redemptive Sacrifice. Christ
did not merely announce salvation: He merited it by His
Sacrifice. His voluntary Passion and Death on the Cross
constitute the sole redemptive Sacrifice by which humanity
is reconciled with God.
- I profess that on the third day He rose
glorious from the dead, and that this Resurrection is
properly a historical fact. It is the most resplendent sign
of His definitive victory over sin, death, and hell. It
constitutes the foundation of Christian hope and the pledge
of our own resurrection. It also represents the principal
motive of credibility for the Divinity of Jesus Christ.
- I believe that forty days later He ascended
into Heaven, that He now sits at the right hand of His
Father, that He invisibly governs His Church through His
Vicar, and that He intercedes for us constantly, awaiting
the time when He shall come again in glory at the end of
time to judge the living and the dead.
- I likewise profess that, although Christ died
for all, not all are thereby saved. The merits of the
Passion must be applied to souls, which ordinarily takes
place when they receive, with the required dispositions, the
sacraments which communicate to them sanctifying grace. He
who refuses the sacraments, receives them unworthily, or
remains voluntarily in sin, shuts himself off from the
salvation which Christ has gained for him.
- I therefore reject the false optimism of a
universal redemption already accomplished in every man,
independently of his conversion and perseverance. Such a
doctrine destroys the urgency of preaching, weakens
missionary zeal, renders penance useless, and contradicts
the very words of the Saviour: “He that believeth and is
baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be
condemned.”
- I profess finally that Jesus Christ is not only
the Redeemer of individuals, but the centre of all history
and the King of all Creation. All things were created by Him
and for Him; all things must be restored in Him. No culture,
no society, no law, no human wisdom finds its true and
complete perfection outside His reign.
VI.
The Most Holy Virgin Mary in the Economy of Salvation
- I believe that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary
holds a unique place in the history of salvation, willed by
God from all eternity, and that her condition is therefore
not the common condition of other creatures. He Who had
resolved to give His Son to men had also resolved to give
Him a Mother.
- I profess that the Blessed Virgin Mary, by a
singular privilege, was immaculate from the first instant of
her conception, so as to be the worthy Mother of Jesus
Christ: preserved from original sin in anticipation of the
merits of Christ and thus redeemed in a more sublime manner,
filled with grace from the first instant of her existence,
Mary always showed herself perfectly faithful to the Will of
God.
- I believe that she remained ever virgin,
before, during, and after childbirth; her perpetual
virginity manifests the divine origin of her Son and her
total consecration to the work of God.
- I profess that, truly Mother of God and Mother
of men, she was associated in a unique and incomparable
manner with the redemptive work of her divine Son: the new
Eve beside the new Adam, her Fiat opened the way to
the Incarnation; her silent fidelity accompanied the entire
life of the Saviour; her sorrowful Compassion at the foot of
the Cross united her with one heart to the redemptive
Sacrifice.
- I profess that, thus united to her Divine Son,
she merited by congruity in her Compassion what Christ
merited by strict justice in His Passion; not as the
principal cause of the Redemption, but as a subordinate
associate, dependent upon and wholly relative to her Son, in
one and the same act of the Redemption of our souls. It is
in this sense that Catholic piety, supported by the
traditional teaching of Popes and theologians, rightly calls
her, by reason of this Compassion, ‘Co-redemptrix’, and
consequently ‘Universal Mediatrix’.
- I consequently reject with indignation the
modern tendency to diminish the privileges of the Most
Blessed Virgin under pretext of ecumenical prudence, of
dialogue with false religions, or from a fallacious fear of
obscuring the unique redemptive Mediation of Jesus Christ.
To weaken Marian doctrine is not to honour Christ better: it
is to misunderstand the order willed by God, Who wished to
come to us through Mary and to lead us to Himself through
her.
- I believe that at the end of her earthly life,
she was taken up, body and soul, into celestial glory, where
she reigns beside the throne of God, alongside the holy
humanity of her Divine Son, over angels and men, exercising
her maternal role as Dispensatrix of all Graces.
- I finally profess that the authentic and
special cult rendered to His Mother in no way diminishes the
worship due to God; on the contrary, it increases it,
because it recognizes the marvels of divine grace in the
most perfect of creatures, and leads souls more surely to
Jesus Christ. True Catholic restoration cannot be separated
from the honour rendered to her who crushes the head of the
serpent.
VII.
The Catholic Church, Mystical Body of Christ and Sole Ark of
Salvation
- I firmly believe that, to perpetuate and
prolong the work of Redemption until the end of time, Our
Lord Jesus Christ founded one Church, visible, hierarchical,
indefectible, and necessary for salvation. This Church,
purchased by the Blood of Christ, entrusted to Peter and his
successors, the Roman Pontiffs, is none other than the Roman
Catholic Church.
- I profess that the Church is One, Holy,
Catholic, and Apostolic. She is One in her Faith, her
worship, her government, and her end. She is Holy by her
Founder, by her doctrine, by her sacraments, and by the
saints whom she ceaselessly brings forth. She is Catholic
because, sent to all peoples and established throughout the
whole world, she is everywhere fitted to procure the
salvation of men of every condition. She is Apostolic
because she remains founded upon the Apostles, preserves
their doctrine, and continues their mission, governed by
their successors.
- I profess that the Church is identically a
visible society and the Mystical Body of Christ. Christ is
her Head; the faithful are her members; the supernatural
life purchased upon the Cross is communicated in her through
the sacraments received in faith, and flourishes in charity.
- I profess that the Church is the Immaculate
Bride of Christ. Christ loved her to the point of delivering
Himself for her, in order to sanctify her and present her to
Himself without spot or wrinkle. If her members can sin, she
herself, in her doctrine, her sacraments, her divine
constitution, and her end, remains the faithful and pure
guardian of the revealed Deposit, and the dispenser of the
mysteries of God. The faults of churchmen cannot be imputed
to the Church as such; they arise from the fact that these
men have not lived according to her holy laws. I therefore
reject the unjust and blasphemous accusations levelled
against the Church in the name of the sins of her children,
and likewise the acts of repentance which seem to lay upon
the Bride of Christ the faults of those who have betrayed
her.
- I profess that the Church is the Mother of
souls. She begets them to the divine life through Baptism,
nourishes them through the Eucharist, raises them up again
through Penance, strengthens them through Confirmation,
sanctifies families through Matrimony, consecrates priests
through Holy Orders, and assists the dying through Extreme
Unction. Her motherhood is supernatural and salvific: she
gives to men the bread of sound doctrine, grace, and the
means of eternal life.
- I profess that God willed to make the Church
the necessary means of salvation; just as there is under
Heaven no other name given to men than that of Jesus Christ
by which we must be saved, so there is no supernatural
salvation independent of the Catholic Church. For all
salvation comes from Jesus Christ; and every saving grace is
either given in and through the one Church He has founded,
or orders the one who receives it to that same Church.
- This truth means that no one can be saved
without Christ and His Church, through a false religion as
such, nor be assured of His salvation outside the visible
structure of the Church. If men are saved without belonging
to the visible society which is the Church, the Mystical
Body of Christ, it is by a supernatural ordination to the
one Church of salvation, and in spite of the errors of the
false religions in which they find themselves, from which
they free themselves by not refusing the grace offered to
them and by corresponding to it.
- I therefore reject false ecumenism, which rests
upon the idea that the Holy Ghost would not refuse to use
separated communities as means of salvation, as though the
Church of Christ were present and active in them, or as
though these communities possessed in themselves a salvific
value whose efficacy would derive from the fullness of grace
and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church. If any man comes
to the revealed truth or receives a grace of sanctification
outside the visible limits of the Catholic Church, that
truth and that grace belong by right to that same Church and
unequivocally call to Catholic unity, and the Holy Ghost
does not give these as means of salvation by using separated
communities as such, of which souls can never be warned too
much.
- I likewise reject the idea that non-Christian
religions might reflect a ray of truth which illumines every
man, or might be legitimate paths by which God positively
leads men to salvation. Some fragments of natural truth, or
distorted vestiges of ancient truths, may indeed be
encountered among the adherents of these false religions;
but these religions taken as such, and insofar as they
mingle error with their worship, are the work of the devil
and cannot be acceptable to God. The Holy Ghost does not use
them as paths to salvation, and in them there is no proper
virtue of the one Church of Christ, the sole light which
enlightens every man in the darkness.
- I further reject the idea of an ‘anonymous
Christianity’, according to which any man who leads a
naturally honest life, whether ‘believer’, atheist, or
agnostic, would be oriented towards Christ and therefore
saved by Him, as a ‘Christian’ without knowing it.
- I finally profess that the Old Covenant has
been fulfilled, surpassed, and rendered obsolete by the New
Covenant, which is the fulfilment of the promise made to
Abraham, in Christ and in His Church. The figures of the old
Law have found their realization and their cessation in the
Sacrifice of the true Lamb, Mediator of the New Covenant and
Priest forever according to the order of Melchisedech. By
the eternal Will of God, the true descendant of Abraham is
Christ, together with those who belong to Him in His
Mystical Body, which is the Church.
- I therefore reject the new ecclesiology, which
destroys the missionary impulse by relativizing the
uniqueness of the Church, the sole ark of salvation.
- I likewise reject inculturation understood as
the indiscriminate adoption of the religious, moral, or
symbolic categories of pagan cultures and their practices.
The Gospel can assume what is naturally good, true, and
noble in peoples; it can never consecrate idolatry,
superstition, error, or customs contrary to the natural law.
The mission of the Church is not an indefinite dialogue, a
humanitarian cooperation, or a mutual recognition of
religious traditions: it is the command received from Christ
to teach all nations, to baptize them, and to teach them to
observe all that He has commanded.
VIII.
The Holy Ghost, Sanctifier of Souls and Soul of the Church
- I profess that the Holy Ghost, the third Person
of the Most Holy Trinity, true God with the Father and the
Son, has spoken through the prophets, inspired the
Scriptures, sanctified the just, formed the humanity of the
Word Incarnate in the virginal womb of Mary, and was visibly
sent at Pentecost to manifest the Church and to give her
life until the consummation of the ages.
- I believe that, sent by the Father and the Son,
He abides in the Church until the end of time, in accordance
with the promise of Our Lord. He is the uncreated Soul of
the Church, not as a substantial form which would abolish
the distinction between Christ and His members, but as the
invisible principle and efficient cause of her supernatural
life, of her unity of profession of Faith and worship, of
the holiness of her government and her Magisterium, and of
her fruitfulness in her works.
- I profess that the whole life of the Church
depends upon His action. It is He Who assists the
ecclesiastical Magisterium, and especially that of the Pope,
so that it may preserve, declare, and explain the revealed
Deposit without error: not that it may invent new doctrines,
but that it may penetrate more deeply, in the same sense and
the same meaning, the truth already revealed by God to the
Apostles.
- I believe that it is He Who communicates to
souls, in the sacraments, the grace gained by the Saviour,
dwells in them through that grace, and conforms them to
Christ; He Who enlightens minds by His wisdom, sustains
wills by His power, and pours His charity into hearts; He
Who gives rise to good works, inspires fraternal charity,
and leads souls towards their perfection.
- It is He Who has sustained the martyrs,
enlightened the Doctors, raised up missionaries, nourished
the contemplative life, fructified religious orders, and
caused holiness to flourish in all states of life. The great
works of Christian civilization, fruits of Catholic culture,
themselves bear witness to this discreet yet fruitful
presence of the Spirit of God in the Church throughout the
centuries.
- I therefore reject every claim to invoke the
Holy Ghost in order to justify doctrinal adaptations that
break with Tradition, moral reversals, or synodal procedures
by which what the Church has received from God is put in
question. The Spirit of truth cannot today inspire the
contrary of what He inspired yesterday. He does not invite
the Church to listen to the world in order to receive its
aspirations from it; on the contrary, He impels her to teach
the world, to convert it, and to sanctify it. His work
consists neither in stirring up anarchic inspirations, nor
in encouraging doctrinal creativity, nor in grounding
spiritual life upon the search for extraordinary charismatic
phenomena; it consists in guiding souls by enlightening
their faith and defending them against their spiritual
enemies, in order to complete in them the work of their
salvation and to lead them into the light of eternity.
IX.
The Roman Pontiff, the Episcopate, and the Hierarchical
Constitution of the Church
- I recognize in the Roman Pontiff the successor
of Saint Peter, the Vicar of Jesus Christ, the supreme and
universal Pastor, the visible head of the whole Church,
possessing, by divine institution, a power of truly proper,
supreme, full, immediate, and universal jurisdiction over
all pastors and over all the faithful baptized in the
Church.
- I believe that this authority does not come to
him from a delegation by the community, but directly from
Christ Himself, Who instituted this office for the
safeguarding of the doctrine of faith, the sanctification of
souls, and the government of the Church.
- I recognize that by reason of this proper and
genuine power, pastors and faithful owe him respect and
filial obedience in all that concerns the legitimate
exercise of his office. Thus, the unity of communion with
the Roman Pontiff and the unity of profession of the same
Faith being safeguarded, the Church of Christ constitutes
one flock under one supreme Pastor.
- I likewise recognize that the bishops are the
successors of the Apostles, which makes them true pastors by
divine right, possessing in the Church, by the will of
Christ, a particular and subordinate jurisdiction which they
receive immediately from the Roman Pontiff. United with him,
in submission to his supreme authority, they legitimately
exercise their own authority in their respective dioceses,
as established by the Holy Ghost in the hierarchical order
willed by Christ.
- I further recognize that the body of bishops,
united with its head the Roman Pontiff and never without
that head, can be the extraordinary and non-permanent
subject of a full and supreme power over the universal
Church, but that this takes place only in the act of an
ecumenical council, on the initiative and at the order of
the Roman Pontiff alone, and within the limits of his
exclusive will.
- I consequently reject the collegialist
conceptions which would make the college of bishops a
permanent moral person in the Church, or a second subject of
supreme power, distinct from the successor of Peter. The
monarchical constitution of the Church is of divine and
inviolable institution, and it will remain so until the end
of time, for no one can redefine the function that Christ
Himself conferred upon Peter in His Church.
- I likewise reject the synodalist conceptions
which tend to transform the hierarchical Church into a
consultative, parliamentary, or democratic structure,
subject to the fluctuating opinions of the Christian people
or to the pressures of the world. The collective conscience
of the faithful, pastoral surveys, cultural sensibilities,
and the expectations of the world are not sources of
Revelation. The legitimate hearing of souls can never become
a continual adaptation of the life of the Church, her
doctrine, and her divine constitution to the spirit of the
world, under pretext of interpreting the ‘sensus fidei’
of the people of God.
X.
The Magisterium, Guardian of the Revealed Deposit
- I believe that the Roman Pontiff enjoys
infallibility when he speaks ex cathedra, that is,
when, fulfilling his office as pastor and doctor of all
Christians, he defines, by virtue of his supreme apostolic
authority, that a doctrine concerning faith or morals is to
be held by the universal Church.
- I further profess that the power of the
Magisterium in the Church is essentially ordered to the
safeguarding of the revealed Deposit and, through this
means, to the salvation of souls. The Holy Ghost was not
promised to the successors of Peter so that they might
manifest new doctrine, but so that they might guard holily
and expound faithfully the Deposit transmitted by the
Apostles.
- This is why the present Magisterium cannot
substantially contradict the prior Magisterium. The living
Magisterium is not current preaching set in opposition to
past preaching; it is the continual and uninterrupted
preaching of the same truth of Faith with the same meaning
throughout the centuries. The Pope and the bishops are not
the masters of Revelation; they are its guardians and are
subject to it as a disciple is subject to his master. They
can neither change the Faith, nor modify the divine
constitution of the Church, nor declare good what is
contrary to the law of God.
- I therefore reject every evolutionist
conception of dogma, according to which revealed truths
would change their meaning over the course of history. There
can be within the Church a homogeneous progress in
understanding, which perceives better, in a more distinct
and explicit manner, the meaning of revealed truth, but
never a mutation in the meaning of that truth. What has
already been taught by the living Magisterium of the
Teaching Church, and believed in the profession of Faith of
the Church Taught, cannot become false; what has been
condemned as contrary to the Faith cannot become legitimate;
what belongs to the divine constitution of the Church cannot
be remodelled according to the categories of the modern
world or the historico-cultural context.
- I therefore reject the notion of a new
Magisterium, which would claim the authority of the present
day to impose doctrines opposed or foreign to what is
constant Tradition. I likewise reject the artificial
opposition between the Magisterium of yesterday and that of
today, as if the sole living Magisterium of the Bride of
Christ were that of the present, and could, under pretext of
better adapting it, renounce what the Church has always
taught, believed, and condemned since the time of the
Apostles.
- I hold that, the legitimate freedom of research
and opinion of theologians in relation to open or disputed
doctrinal questions remaining intact, the Magisterium of the
Church has the legitimate duty to exercise supervision and,
where appropriate, censorship over publications, to prevent
them from endangering the faith of the faithful. I therefore
reject the accusation levelled against the holy Church of
having lacked charity in anathematizing heresies and
excommunicating heretics.
- I also reject the perpetual dialogue
established in the spirit of the last Council, by which the
hierarchy renounces the exercise of a true Magisterium, and
claims sometimes to receive its inspiration from the ‘sense
of faith’ of the believing people, sometimes to converse on
equal terms with the adherents of false religions or even
with unbelievers.
- I finally reject the subjectivist conception of
theological pluralism which flows from such a resignation of
the magisterial function. I hold that the Church is not an
assembly in permanent search, but the guardian of a truth
revealed by God and transmitted by the Apostles, and that
her authentic Magisterium is the proximate and universal
rule of truth in matters of faith and morals, ensuring the
uninterrupted transmission of the revealed Deposit
throughout the centuries.
XI.
The Moral Order and the Law of God
- I profess that there exists a moral order truly
founded in the eternal wisdom of God. Human acts are good or
evil according to their conformity or opposition to the
divine law, which is holy and indefectible. Individual
opinions, social consensus, subjective intentions, and
historical circumstances cannot change the inviolable value
of these principles of Christian morality.
- From the immense goodness by which God has
raised man up to the supernatural order, it follows that man
has but one ultimate end, supernatural in character, to
which he remains ordered according to God’s design, even
after sin. This supernatural end assumes, raises, and
perfects the end of man’s natural order.
- The natural law, inscribed by God in human
nature, remains knowable by right reason and binds all men.
The positive revealed law, being of the supernatural order,
confirms, raises, and clarifies the natural law whilst
surpassing it. There is therefore no opposition between the
law of the Gospel and the natural law; furthermore, the same
grace gives man the strength to be supernaturally faithful
to the demands of both, and thus to enjoy that liberty of
the children of God by which, freed from the power of sin,
man can tend towards his ultimate end.
- I therefore reject situation ethics, according
to which concrete circumstances could render actions that
are intrinsically evil good. In particular, I hold that no
circumstance can ever legitimize recourse to contraception,
abortion, or euthanasia. I reject every doctrine which would
claim that a course of action objectively contrary to the
commandments of God could constitute, for some persons, the
generous response demanded by God in that moment. God never
commands sin, nor what is impossible; He never blesses moral
disorder and never justifies what contradicts His own law;
but to him who does his utmost, He never refuses the grace
to keep His commandments.
- I profess that adulterous unions, unions
contrary to nature, and all public situations contrary to
the divine law cannot be presented as imperfect goods, gifts
of God, positive steps, or realities which may be blessed as
such. Such a misleading presentation gravely distorts the
principles of Christian morality, and harms the sacred
institution of marriage and the good of families.
- I therefore reject as contrary to the Faith and
to the constant discipline of the Church the claim to admit
to the sacraments, and most especially to the reception of
the Most Holy Eucharist, those who publicly persist in such
states without renouncing their disorder. True mercy calls
the sinner to conversion; it does not ratify sin under the
pretext of pastoral accompaniment or discernment of
particular situations.
- I likewise reject the modern dissociation
between doctrine and pastoral practice. A pastoral practice
that contradicts doctrine is not pastoral; it leads souls
astray. Charity does not consist in silencing truth to avoid
suffering, but in speaking truth with benevolence in order
to lead to salvation. The medicine of the Church can heal
only by naming evil, calling to penance, and offering the
remedies of grace.
- I finally profess that God is not only the
author and end of the moral order, but also its guardian,
its judge, and the sovereign rewarder of good and evil.
Forgetfulness of divine judgement engenders a false mercy,
sentimental and powerless, which saves no one because it
converts no one.
XII.
The Social Kingship of Christ and Christian Civilization
- I profess that the Most Holy Trinity can and
must be acknowledged and adored not only by each individual,
but also by families, institutions, and civil societies. No
human authority is independent of God, for all authority
comes from Him and must be exercised according to the
eternal law.
- I profess that civil societies, like persons,
have the duty to acknowledge and honour this one and only
true God, Who is Jesus Christ, the Word Incarnate, the
second Person of the Holy Trinity, and to render Him the
worship due to Him, in the true religion revealed and
instituted by Him.
- I profess that the authorities which govern
these societies must procure the common good by conforming
themselves to the twofold divine law, natural and revealed.
The use of freedom does not consist in giving free rein to
all the caprices of concupiscence, but in choosing the best
manner of using the goods of this world in view of eternal
salvation.
- I thus reject modern laicism, which claims to
organize society as if God did not exist. The public refusal
to recognize God as sovereign Lord is not neutrality, but a
social injustice towards the Creator and a profound cause of
disorder among peoples. Indeed, a society which refuses God
the honour due to Him progressively destroys the foundations
of its own justice: it severs human law from its eternal
source and delivers peoples to the shifting wills of fallen
man.
- I profess that Our Lord Jesus Christ, because
He is the Word Incarnate and because He has redeemed men by
His Blood, is King not only of individuals, but also of
families, institutions, peoples, and nations. All power has
been given to Him in Heaven and on earth: His reign is not
limited to the interior forum of consciences or to the
private sphere; it must extend to the external forum, to
laws, morals, education, culture, and public life. His
Kingdom is eternal and universal: a kingdom of truth and
life, a kingdom of holiness and grace, a kingdom of justice,
love, and peace.
- I profess that civil society, though perfect in
its own order, does not possess all the means necessary to
lead man to his true perfection, which remains inaccessible
to fallen human nature without the help of grace, which
heals and raises up.
- This is why I profess that those who govern
society must submit to the salutary influence of the Church,
which enlightens minds through her Magisterium, heals and
strengthens wills through the grace of the sacraments, and
directs man towards his true supernatural destiny, of which
she is the guardian. The good of society consequently
demands that heads of state recognize their right and duty
to favour and protect the holy Church, and likewise to
oppose by the laws of their government whatever would
obstruct her necessary influence, which is that of the one
true religion.
- I therefore reject political and religious
liberalism: not only that which claims for error the same
rights as for truth, and for false forms of worship the same
official and public recognition as for the true; but also
that which, in the name of human dignity and a false
religious freedom, attributes to everyone the right to act
publicly according to his conscience without being hindered
by civil authority, even when that conscience is erroneous
and opposed to the common good or to the true religion.
- I acknowledge that error can in certain cases
be tolerated to avoid greater evils, or to preserve the
greater good of civil peace, but I profess that it does not
possess in itself a moral right to be defended or encouraged
on the same footing as truth, nor in the name of a false
freedom of conscience never to be impeded.
- I likewise hold that, although man possesses an
ontological dignity which raises him above material beings,
the human dignity to be respected is not indifferent to the
truth and error professed by persons, nor to the good and
evil they accomplish: he who professes error or does evil
forfeits his moral dignity. This is why legitimate authority
in no way attacks human dignity when it punishes crimes
according to the demands of justice, by proportionate
penalties, in order to defend the common good against grave
disorders.
- I also reject that modern form of personalism
which would assign to the Church the mission of safeguarding
the dignity of the human person, and of establishing a
universal fraternity upon the foundation of this allegedly
common dignity of the human race — without making any
distinction between, on the one hand, the true dignity of
the Christian who renounces sin in order to live according
to evangelical morality in the Catholic Church, and, on the
other, the false dignity of those who, lost in error and
vice, refuse the path of salvation.
- I reject the falsification that flows from
this, which tends to make the Church, if not the servant, at
least the collaborator of the world in the realization of
its own ideal: that of a purely earthly and temporal peace,
founded upon a naturalistic perfecting of humanity, devoid
of supernatural perspective. This ideal fosters the
independence of man with regard to God, His law, truth, and
the good; it implies contempt for the Social Kingship of
Christ and for Christendom, and leads ultimately to atheism
and the substitution of man for God.
- I likewise reject the modern prejudice which
presents Christian civilization as oppressive, obscurantist,
or hostile to human dignity. Far from destroying what is
good in different cultures, the Christian order assumes and
purifies it. Thus, from revealed doctrine and through the
radiance of Catholic theology, especially that of Saint
Thomas Aquinas, Common Doctor of the Church, there was
constituted, under the vigilance of the Magisterium, a true
Christian culture of universal scope, integrating the finest
elements of Greek and Latin culture. An authentic fruit of
the Gospel, it contributed to educating peoples and causing
them to grow in faith and Christian virtues. Even if it was
never perfect, men always remaining sinners, this
civilization was nonetheless in history the highest
realization of the Christian social order.
- Conversely, the modern refusal of the Social
Kingship of Christ has produced a regression of
civilization, through the secularization of institutions,
the dissolution of marriage, the destruction of authority,
education without God, the tyranny of the passions, and the
progressive effacement of the spirit of sacrifice in
once-Catholic nations. Against this public apostasy, we
profess that all things must be restored in Christ, Who
alone is holy and Who, through His Mystical Body, is the
only sanctifier of souls and of peoples.
XIII.
The Sacraments of the New Law
- I believe that there are seven sacraments
properly so called of the New Law, instituted by Our Lord
Jesus Christ to confer efficaciously the grace which they
signify: Baptism, Confirmation, the Eucharist, Penance,
Extreme Unction, Holy Orders, and Matrimony.
- I profess that the sacraments must be validly
celebrated with the prescribed matter, form, and intention,
observing the liturgical rites which clearly express the
Catholic Faith; and that they must be received with the
required dispositions.
- I believe that Baptism is the door of the
Church and that it is necessary for salvation. Ordinarily,
no one can be saved without receiving it; through this
sacrament, man is washed from original sin, incorporated
into Christ, marked with the Christian character, and made a
member of the Church. I therefore reject the practice of
deferring without grave cause the Baptism of children who
have not the use of reason. However, one who, after the age
of reason and without fault on his part, is prevented from
accessing this sacrament, can be saved in an extraordinary
manner by Baptism of Desire, that is, by a supernatural act
of faith and perfect charity which orders him to the Church.
- I profess that Confirmation strengthens the
baptized through the gift of the Holy Ghost, so that he may
courageously confess the Faith, resist the enemies of
salvation, and live as a witness to Christ. In a time of
confusion, this supernatural strength is particularly
necessary, for no one can keep the Faith without combat.
- I profess that Penance remits sins committed
after Baptism, by means of the acts of the penitent, which
are contrition, confession, and satisfaction. I firmly
reject every pastoral approach which weakens the sense of
sin, minimizes the necessity of sacramental confession, or
reduces satisfaction to a mere act of reparation towards
oneself or others, without reference to the offence
committed against God.
- I profess that Extreme Unction relieves and
strengthens the sick, remits sins when this is applicable,
powerfully contributes to effacing the punishment due to
sin, and prepares the Christian soul to appear before God.
- I affirm that Matrimony is the stable and
indissoluble union of one man and one woman, elevated by
Christ to the dignity of a sacrament between the baptized.
The purpose of this union, established by God, the Orderer
of nature, is twofold: the generation and education of
children on the one hand, which constitutes the primary and
principal end of marriage; the mutual support of the spouses
and the remedy for concupiscence on the other, which are its
secondary ends: true and essential ends, but naturally
subordinated to the first.
- I therefore reject every doctrine which
considers unions contrary to marriage as real, if imperfect,
participations in it; or which, wishing to define marriage
in terms of the love of the spouses alone, destroys the
hierarchy of the ends of marriage, at the risk of
legitimizing divorce, the refusal of children, and thereby
contraception, which is contrary to the natural law.
- I confess that the sacrament of Holy Orders
imprints upon him who receives it the sacerdotal character
which configures him to Christ the Priest, and that no woman
can receive it at any degree whatsoever. Thereby, the priest
receives the power to offer the salutary Sacrifice for the
living and the dead, to remit sins, and to sanctify the
faithful. I thus reject all confusion between the
priesthood, in the true and proper sense of the ministers of
Christ, and the common priesthood, used in an improper sense
with reference to the faithful: the faithful offer
spiritually with the priest and through the priest; but only
the duly ordained priest realizes and offers sacramentally
the Sacrifice in the Person of Christ.
XIV. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Holy Eucharist, and the
Catholic Liturgy
- I profess that the Mass is truly, in the proper
sense of the word, a Sacrifice. It is not merely a memorial
of the Last Supper or of the Passion; celebrated by a duly
ordained priest, it sacramentally represents the unique
Sacrifice of Calvary, and renews it in an unbloody manner,
without however multiplying it. The Victim is the same, the
principal Priest is the same; only the manner of offering
differs.
- In the Mass, and through the action of His
minister, Our Lord Jesus Christ offers Himself to His Father
as a Sacrifice of adoration, thanksgiving, propitiation, and
impetration. By uniting herself to this action of Christ,
which is identical to that of the celebrating priest, the
Church renders to God the perfect worship due to Him, and
applies to the souls of the living and the dead the merits
of the Sacrifice of the Cross.
- I believe that, through the words of
Consecration validly pronounced by a priest, the bread and
wine are changed in their entire substance into the Body and
Blood of Christ, though their sensible accidents remain.
This admirable change is rightly called Transubstantiation.
- I believe that the Most Holy Eucharist occupies
the centre of the life of the Church, and that it truly,
really, and substantially contains the Body, Blood, Soul,
and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ. I adore the Most
Blessed Sacrament of the altar and reject every doctrine or
practice which weakens faith in the Real Presence,
diminishes the respect due to the Eucharist, trivializes
Holy Communion, or alters the sacred character of the
sanctuary.
- Because it is the privileged expression of
faith, the liturgy is also the permanent school in which the
Christian soul is formed. Through its orientation, its
silence, its gestures, its canon, its sacred language, its
spirit of adoration, and its theocentric structure, the
liturgy nourishes faith and exercises a profound influence
upon souls. Through it, peoples learn to think according to
God, to judge according to eternity, to love what is holy,
to despise what is transient, and to order their entire life
to the Sacrifice of Christ. It also shapes morals and
inspires the arts, institutions, feasts, and customs of the
Christian people. This is why, when divine worship becomes
prosaic, hollow, equivocal, profane, or anthropocentric, it
weakens the very understanding of the Faith.
- I profess that the traditional Roman Mass,
celebrated according to the rite in use before the reform of
the Novus Ordo Missae, expresses with incomparable
clarity the Catholic doctrine of Sacrifice, the priesthood,
and the Real Presence. But I observe with sorrow that the
contemporary liturgical reforms have departed considerably
from the traditional liturgy, on the whole as in its
details: in so doing, they have obscured the sacrificial and
propitiatory character of the Mass, fostered a democratic
conception of worship, brought Catholic liturgical
expression closer to Protestant conceptions, and thereby
contributed preponderantly to the loss of the sense of the
sacred, the corruption of the Christian spirit, the decline
of vocations, and the general weakening of the Faith.
- I therefore reject every liturgical reform or
usage which, through omission, doctrinal ambiguity, or
practical orientation, favours heresy, weakens faith,
departs from the Catholic doctrine of the Mass as formulated
at the Council of Trent, or turns the faithful away from the
adoration due to God. The public worship of the Church must
express the Catholic Faith without equivocation.
- I am certain, finally, that the Catholic
restoration of peoples necessarily involves the restoration
of divine worship, through the traditional liturgy of all
time. Where the Mass is celebrated as the true Sacrifice of
Christ, faith, piety, the life of grace, Christian families,
vocations, and the desire for eternal goods are reborn.
XV.
Christian Life, Holiness, and the Perfection of Charity
- I believe that the supreme vocation of man is
holiness. Created by God, redeemed by Christ, and sanctified
by the action of the Holy Ghost, man is called to
participate in the very life of God through a growing
conformity to His Will, so as to attain perfect and
definitive union with Him in glory.
- I believe that sanctifying grace makes man an
adoptive child of the Father, a member of Jesus Christ, a
temple of the Holy Ghost, and an heir of eternal life. It
makes the soul pleasing to God, communicates to it a created
participation in the Divine Nature, makes it capable of
supernatural acts, and orders it to the Beatific Vision. The
theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity unite the
soul directly to God; the infused moral virtues order its
conduct to the divine law; the gifts of the Holy Ghost make
it apt to receive His inspirations with docility, conferring
upon the virtues their ultimate perfection.
- I believe that the Christian life involves, to
a very great and by no means negligible degree, a spiritual
combat. Since the fall, man remains exposed to the
temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil. Grace
does not suppress this combat: it gives the necessary
strength to engage in it victoriously.
- I believe that the path to holiness is by
imitation of Jesus Christ, obedience to His commandments,
prayer, the sacraments, penance, self-renunciation, fidelity
to one’s duty of state, and love of the Cross. The disciple
is not above his Master: if he wishes to enter into glory,
he must walk in the footsteps of the crucified Christ.
- I therefore reject the false Christianity
without the Cross, which promises earthly peace without
conversion, mercy without penance, brotherhood without
dependence upon the Fatherhood of God, and holiness without
heroism. The Church has never canonized mediocrity,
adaptation to the world, or merely natural goodwill; she has
proposed, for the imitation of her faithful, saints whose
faith was integral, whose charity was heroic, and whose
lives were conformed to that of Christ.
- I therefore reject every reduction of the
Christian life to a vague philanthropy, social awareness, or
commitment to the affairs of this world. Christian charity
is first measured not by shared emotion or visible utility,
but by the supernatural love of God above all things and of
one’s neighbour for God’s sake. Corporal mercy itself loses
its true meaning and its authentic value when it is no
longer ordered to spiritual mercy and eternal salvation.
- I profess that holiness is the most beautiful
fruit of the Church. Martyrs, confessors, virgins, monks,
missionaries, doctors, pastors, and all holy faithful souls
bear witness to the power of truth, the fruitfulness of
grace, and the victory of Christ over sin.
XVI. The Last Things and
Christian Hope
- I believe that the present life is a time of
preparation for eternity and therefore of trial. Man has no
lasting dwelling here on earth: he is created for a
supernatural destiny which infinitely surpasses the passing
goods of this world. I believe in life after death, which
one enters by the separation of soul and body.
- I believe that at the end of his earthly life,
each person will appear first before the tribunal of Christ
for the particular judgement and will receive, according to
his thoughts, words, actions, and omissions, the sentence of
his eternal destiny; I also believe that at the end of time,
Our Lord Jesus Christ will return in His glory to preside
over the general judgement.
- I maintain with love and trembling that both
mercy and justice shine forth in the works of God. The sin
of man has offended the glory of the Creator, man has become
the debtor of God, and divine justice demands reparation;
but, in His incomparable mercy, God has given us a Redeemer
Who, as Head of humanity, has offered Himself for the sins
of the whole world: a satisfaction which calls for the
concurrence of our own.
- I trust in the infinite mercy of God: there is
no sin He cannot pardon, nor any misery He does not wish to
relieve; but I firmly condemn that mercy without justice
preached by the new humanism, that of a god who does not
chastise sin, condemns no one, and demands no conversion,
justifying the sin rather than the sinner.
- I profess that souls who die in a state of
mortal sin are condemned to the dreadful abyss of hell, the
eternal punishment of privation of God and the eternal
punishment of fire. I reject every doctrine which denies the
eternity of hell, diminishes the reality of eternal
punishments, or implies that all men will ultimately be
saved, hell remaining empty.
- I believe that souls who die in a state of
grace, but still liable for temporal punishment, are
purified in purgatory. I therefore profess the necessity of
praying for the departed, of applying to them the suffrage
of the Church, and I reject the falsehoods which promise to
all immediate entry into the house of the Father, thereby
extinguishing the pious custom of the Church of praying
constantly for the dead.
- I reject in particular the false pastoral
language which, for fear of troubling consciences, passes
over in silence judgement, hell, and the necessity of
penance. There is no charity in hiding from men the eternal
peril in which sin places them. The preaching of the Last
Things belongs to the mercy of the Church, because it
awakens souls and turns them towards salvation.
- I affirm, finally, that souls who die in the
friendship of God, perfectly purified, enter immediately
into eternal life and enjoy the Beatific Vision. They
contemplate God face to face, as He is, and possess in Him
their eternal rest. The Christian life is ordered to this
beatitude; every pastoral approach which reduces human
happiness to earthly well-being, social peace, or merely
psychological fulfilment betrays the supernatural end of the
Gospel.
- Christian hope is therefore neither earthly
optimism nor uncertainty mingled with fear. It is the
confident expectation of the eternal Kingdom, founded upon
the promises of God and nourished by grace. It gives the
Christian the strength to labour here below without
forgetting that his homeland is in Heaven, and to combat the
errors of the age without losing his peace of soul.
XVII. The Modern Crisis and
the Duty to Confess the Faith
- I believe that the Church, assisted by divine
Providence, remains indefectible until the end of time. The
promise of Christ cannot fail: the gates of hell shall never
prevail against her.
- I believe, however, that the history of the
Church knows periods of trial, in which the profession of
the true Faith is gravely diminished, in which errors
spread, in which discipline weakens, and in which many souls
are led astray.
- I acknowledge in particular that modern errors
represent a dreadful threat to the whole of the Catholic
order, and that their penetration into the life of the
Church, under the influence of the Second Vatican Council
and the post-conciliar reforms, has provoked a crisis of
exceptional gravity: agnosticism attacks the knowledge of
God; naturalism attacks the necessity of grace; subjectivism
attacks the supernatural motive of faith; relativism attacks
the immutability of dogma; situation ethics attacks the
divine law; liberalism attacks the Social Kingship of
Christ; false ecumenism attacks the uniqueness of the
Church; collegiality and synodality attack the divine
constitution of the Church in her hierarchy; liturgical
anthropocentrism attacks the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
- The current crisis therefore cannot be reduced
to a mere conflict of sensibilities, liturgical preferences,
or pastoral options. It touches upon the very foundations of
faith and morals, of the priesthood and worship, of the
Church and the Kingship of Christ.
- These errors do not remain abstract; they have
produced visible fruits: the weakening of doctrinal
preaching, the extinction of the missionary spirit, the
trivialization of sin, the crisis of the family, the ruin of
the liturgy, the loss of the sense of God, the scarcity of
vocations, the silent apostasy of Christian nations, and the
profound confusion of the faithful.
- This is why it is no longer sufficient today to
affirm Catholic truths in general terms, without
simultaneously denouncing the errors which seek to corrupt
them. Charity towards souls demands the clarity of the whole
truth, without any ambiguity.
- This crisis can only be overcome by the
restoration of all things in Jesus Christ, through the
return to the Faith, to the life of grace, to divine
worship, and to the pursuit of holiness.
- In these painful circumstances, without judging
anyone nor usurping the authority of the Church, I cannot
but confess the Faith whose profession is being diminished,
recall the Tradition which is being banished, defend
morality, guard the liturgy, and proclaim the rights of
Christ.
Conclusion
- Faithful to eternal Rome which guards the
Deposit transmitted by the Apostles, I wish to preserve this
heritage integrally, without diminution, without alteration,
and without fear, not as a particular opinion within the
Church of today, but as the Faith received from the Church
that is One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman.
- For this Faith does not belong to me: I have
received it in order to remain faithful to it, to live by
it, to transmit it, and, if God so asks, to suffer for it,
in the confident expectation of the triumph of truth and of
grace, for the salvation of souls and the glory of the Most
Holy Trinity.
- I ask God to keep me firm in this profession of
Faith until the last instant of my life. I entrust this
profession of Faith to the intercession of the Most Blessed
Virgin Mary, the holy Apostles, the martyrs, the confessors,
and all the saints who have preceded us in fidelity to
Christ.
- And in the hope of the resurrection and of the
life of the world to come, I place my soul, the Church, and
all things in the hands of God, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,
to Whom belong honour, glory, and power forever and ever.
Amen.
Given
at Menzingen, on 24 June 2026, the Nativity of Saint John
the Baptist
|
|